Will ESPN-NFL medium invest the impact ESPN’s NFL coverage?

For more than 20 years, NFL and managed the NFL network. It was an obvious conflict of interest in those who pays the NFL to cover the NFL.

While the mere mentions of that obvious dynamic still runs some journalists whose salary is signed by Roger Goodell, the former NFL network reporter Michael Silver confirmed the practical impact of the 2021 relationship. Years.

“Imagine working for ProCter & Gamble and go to Procter & Gamble live from ProCTER & Gamble Studios and you are talking about a scandal that could collapse the whole operation,” at the time. “Would be a little awkward. “

Added silver in connection with the discretion that has worked for NFL: “If someone came to me and said,” I have an exhibition to the security of the player and how NFL covers the earthquins, “I was not your type.” I’m not your type. “

Allowed permissions ongoing, NFL will own 10 percent ESPN. Fair ask whether the same dynamics will be applied to the things that ESPNs told Journalists and analysts about the NFL, its owners and / or its commissioner.

On Wednesday, the former ESPN host Dan Patrick determined that the ship sailed long before league accepted partial ownership of mothers.

“The journalist in me … would point out a conflict of interest,” said Patrick, Via Brendon Kleen of Avfullannouncing.com. “But ESPN cannot be more in bed with NFL when it comes to their coverage. Will the other way look like with any negative story? They probably have already done that. “

ESPN Reporter Don Van Natta Jr. He took an aggressive question with that taking, showing on reporting That he and Kalyn Kahler worked in a relationship with various recent scandals involving the NFL player association. But there is a gigantic difference between reporting scandals involving NFL and scandals involving NFLPA.

The reality is that, yes, potential conflicts exist outside these journalists working directly for league. We all need a certain degree access to work properly. Some journalists will always avoid any report and / or theme that would affect their approach in a negative way.

Then there will be the fact that, that, the NFL will keep the right to complain about the broadcasting of the partner when their journalists / analysts say that NFL does not love. Absolutely occurs.

And causes some people to walk slightly. We discussed months and discussed the hidden judgment in the complaint in agreement against the NFL. No one else in the business did not say or Jack graduated about it. Then, when Pablo Torre revealed a 61 pages secret document and the NFL was invited to team up and testify who actually teamed up, almost all who cover a drop-drop of pro football in water supply.

These pressures and potential conflicts exist for employees about the broadcast partners when the league no Own piece of company for which the reporter / analyst works. When the current ESPN-NFL is a media job finalized, the league will own 10 percent ESPN. It will change things.

How isn’t it?

Then people like out of Natta and / or Kahler and / or anyone else on the ESPN who do not report things that will eventually be published but far more valuable things they don’t want to know They will find out whether the search and publication of the unpleasant NFL truth will request telephone calls from the league offices on their bosses. Or on the bosses of their bosses.

Prior to that, the license for compressing broadcast partners came from the fact that a professional job is a rare job in which the seller is, not the buyer is always right. Once the NFL officially owns a piece of ESPN, the league becomes both the seller and the customer.

And any employee of this unprecedented amalgamation that does not act accordingly will ask for work elsewhere, sooner or later.