Players in the years of the contract have strong post -season influence

Players are not stuck in the last year of a sub -level contract required many options. There is one applicable option rarely discussed.

We know about preparing for the race. We know about the pre-season comment, whether it is done with both sides, knowing that the player will not practice-or whether the player is “injured”.

The player can also cite an injury (or “injury”) to justify the normal season games, without losing wages.

This is an old hat. There was, I did it. There is another one option, just mentioning the nerve of the forces-which. Bigly because it will leave the difference helpless.

For the player in the last year of his contract, his commitment to the final match of the normal season ends. This means that he can go out at the beginning of the post -season (or at any time during the qualifiers) without any contractual result.

we I made this point last DecemberWith regard to the future of Bengapt Tigz. He was looking into a total side in the post -season period of 348,000 dollars only for up to four games, after receiving more than $ 1.2 million a week under the franchise brand. He could have risked a strike that would likely wipe his capabilities, through a free agency, a new deal, or a 26.2 million dollar privilege mark for 2025.

Although the player can face the game’s fines to check the harmful behavior of the team, the player on the brink of the new contract risk more than that-especially if he is at the end of the limited rising deal.

Since the Benglavs did not make the qualifiers, Higgins never had to make a decision on whether he would take additional risks to the lack of additional wage. As for the end of the Bengaps defense, Terry Hendrickson, the recipient Terry McLorin, the cowboy player, Mika Parsons, bills running James Cook, Rams running Kirin Williams, and other players in the years of the contract, and becomes very real.

Without a new contract, why don’t you get away when the current contract is fulfilled?

It is clear that it will lead to a storm of controversy. The fans revolted against the player. Many in the media will not understand. Some even in the Treasury room will be recruited to the player who has been rejected by a financial reward and has deliberately refused to play in the post -season.

So what about this approach? I announce the intentions now. Explain this clearly.

“The qualifying games are additional games, for very additional wages. I will not play in additional games unless I get financial security after the current season.”

It is one thing for Mika Parsons to request trade. It is completely another thing that Parsons says that, without a new contract, he will refuse to play in the qualifiers. He will do everything in his power to help cowboy to qualify, but what the cow’s shepherds did not give him the contract that they failed to grant him since the end of his third regular season, he will not play.

As previously for McClorin, Hendricsson, and the rest. The faster the point, the more people you can reconcile with it.

If the player does not eventually play the qualifiers, the team may not get the player to blame the situation.

It is easy to blame the player. It is easy to line up behind the owners and root for washing. But the owners know how to use the leverage. This is why they will not feel overwhelmed if/when this specific form of the leverage is used against them.