Nascar asks the court to reversal preliminary orders granted to 23xi

Daytona Beach, Fla. – NASCAR on Wednesday asked an appeals court to reversal a preliminary injection that allows 23xi races and front row car sports to compete as chartered teams, despite not signing an agreement in which he said that he said The decisions of the district court were “with mistakes, and each guarantees reversal of his orders. “

In a short time to the fourth Court of Appeal, Nascar said the order “Federal Federal Antitrust Law; apply the set rules regarding the use of provisional orders; ignore undisturbed, legally significant evidence; and have the implications of the Nascar’s 2025 Cup season. “

Nascar also said in his instruction: “The District Court’s decision to impose the extraordinary remedy of preliminary orders – forcing Nascar to expand the benefits of charges to the opponents of the litigation – was loaded with errors, both legal and factual. “

The Court of Appeal is expected to hear arguments in May with a decision possible in June.

23xi Racing and Front Row Motorsports sought an order to allow them to be charged with teams while the case goes through the court.

23xi Racing Fields Toyotas for Tyler Reddick, Bubba Wallace and Riley Herbst. Leading Motorsports Fields Fords for Todd Gilliland, Noah Gragson and Zane Smith.

The first attempt by the teams for an order was denied on November 8 after the court found that the plaintiffs did not show the “irreparable damage” needed to grant the requested order, but that the plaintiffs were invited to to submit a renewed motion for a preliminary order ‘as circumstances.’

After a new judge was assigned to the case, a new request was granted for provisional order on December 18.

Nascar said in his order: “The order of the court included both the newly requested relief as well as additional relief Never requested by plaintiffs: That Nascar 23xi’s purchase from a Bill of SHR approved. “

Under the impact of the preliminary order, Nascar said: “The fact that plaintiffs withdrew his best and final offers months after Nascar withdrew-and on various conditions that the plaintiffs prefer-are important to Nascar and Nascar competitors. After the plaintiffs refused to sign the charters, Nascar recalculated racial wallets, reconsidered the number of available racing positions and communicated these updated details to 2025 Cup series participants.

‘By securing charges, the plaintiffs hit the jackpot-more racing and more prize money-even though they deliberately rejected the NASCAR’s close-backed final offers, and other teams have already started strategizing for a 32- Charter 2025 Cup Series season. At this point, NASCAR would prefer to extend the benefits of the 2025 charter to owners committed to improving the competitiveness of NASCAR with other sports for fans, sponsors and media rollers – rather than owners who undermine the brand of NASCAR and Seeking advantages over other owners in Charter terms. “

The preliminary order is only for this season with a jury hearing starting on December 1st.

23xi Racing and Front Row Motorsports filed an antitrust lawsuit on October 2 against NASCAR stating: “Nascar has retained its monopoly position illegally to offer a top-level stock-run range in the United States contrary to the Sherman Antitrust Act. “