Higher Court rise prohibits the right magazine magazine magazine

A court of Leipzig has raised the ban of the German government under the influence of the remote magazine magazine.

Emulating Germany is seen as a blow to the right end of Germany, although for others, although for others, the country’s high standard speech standards may be.

In July 2024, the German Ministry of Interior was banned by the magazine, arguing that he was attacked by the German rhetoric.

“It’s the central vowel of the right extreme scene,” said Nancy Faeer Germans at the time. “This magazine turns hatred against the Jews against people with migration background and against our democracy.”

The magazine alternative to German alternative (AFD) is closely linked to (AFD) and prior German home intelligence was classified at the right end.

On Tuesday the Judge Judges accepted the magazine that he published the contents against the Constitution, but decided that this was not justified by the prohibition.

A lot of tract statements can be seen as “excessive but authorized criticism,” said the question of Ingo Kraft. “The Constitution guarantees the freedom of expression and freedom of the press to the enemies of the Constitution.”

After the announcement, Jürgen Elsässer, described his magazine with the name “Democracy’s attack gun”, said the authority would also help the AFD aspect. If his magazine cannot be banned, then no AFD said.

There is a cruel discussion in Germany to try to prohibit AFDs, ranked as extremist right extreme by the German intelligence. Many AFD critics could be a counterproductive ban on the narrative of the party victim.

In the last year, German officials have banned, or tried to prohibit a large number of anti-organizations, related to some extreme extreme groups. AFD and the right activists say that a oppressive situation is silent.

Some supporters of Donald Trump have also blamed the deletion of free talk Germany. At the Munich Security Conference in February Vice President JD Vance attacked Germany who surprised the European officialsLeaving AFD outside politics and blaming the main politicians against the anti-conference delay against the rebellion.

In fact, the AFD politicians are the staple of German television talk and have the same rights to address the main aspects of the German Parliament.

Century 15. Century national experiences and totalitarian regimes. Due to dependent experience, there are large barriers to prohibit speech and publications and organizations.

The cases often lead to courts and passed by the judges. The decision to publish the rights of the Far-Right magazine cannot be attracted by the government.