Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

American trumps for welfare cuts “Bill Bill”


Elizabeth Butler goes from one supermarket to the home country of Martinsburg to ensure that it gets the best price for each item in his food list.

Along with 42 million Americans, he pays these foods with federal food. This money does not cover the entire invoice for three families.

“Our food does not last a month,” he explained. “I will go to all different places to ensure that you will last full food.”

This money is soon exhausted, Congress to vote for Donald Trump’s US president “great” great “great” bill “.

The food grant program used by MS Butler – is known as SNAP. Congresses that the President tries to comply with conflicting demands of taxes and balancing budget.

The Senate must vote for the invoice version at the end of the week. If it passes, then, it will vote at home, which point will be sent to Trump. It pressed two chambers of the Republican Party Congress, until the bill is 4 July.

Snap offers low-income houses, including older Americans, children and people who are disabled families, money to buy money every month. In West Virginia, one of the states with the highest poverty fees depends on the benefit of 16% of the population.

The statue is also a reliable republican fortress and November Trump voted tremendously when he ordered the cost of the American life, including the price of the food.

“When I win, I will immediately bring down prices, starting the day,” said at august press conference, in a press conference surrounded by bottled food, milk, meat and eggs.

For a few months of commitment to the president, food prices like orange juice, eggs and bacon are higher than last year.

Mrs. Butler is not going unnoticed: “The President has not yet changed the prices of food and promised that people would do that.”

Trump argues how, without explanation, without helping spending cuts on a 1,000-page budget bill.

“Individuals, a beautiful bill will ultimately strengthen the costs through measures and the common sense work requirements,” said a White House Official BBC.

Republicans have long been distributed to how Snap and Medicaid are funded by social well-being programs. Many believe that the government prioritizes budget balancing, especially in the regions of the poor, in support programs that help their components directly.

As part of the invoice, the Republicans of the Senate (propose $ 154 million) with states responsible for completing the difference.

In theory, the passage of the bill must be an easy political lift, as Republicans control two chambers of Congress and the White House.

However, the invoice includes cuts for programs such as SNAP and Medicaid, known for daily Americans, selling to all the factions within the Party of the Republic has not been an easy feat.

In recent weeks of private frustration and disagreement about Medicaid and Snap capacity cuts, it shows the internal struggle that is taking place throughout the party.

Jim Justice West Virginia said in June, that the Republicans warned, a cutting cut that the party could cost the party in the Congress when they go to the election in 2026.

“If we don’t care, people will hurt, people will be angry. No.1 Thing will be in the night news all over the place,” Justice said. “And then we could wake up very well to the state of this country that becomes a minority.”

Last survey conducted by the Associated Press / Norc Center for research research It is found that 45% of Americans believe that they are food support programs like Snap, and 30% believe that the level of financing is appropriate. Found programs found a quarter of respondents.

This is not the first time that the party has struggled with cuts, Tracy roof, a richmond teacher who is now a book about the political history of Snap.

According to the Biden Administration, the Congress expanded the advantages launched during Covid to disappearAlthough Republicans and Democrats, American warnings could be starved.

“One thing (Snap) is supported by two game support, more than any other poverty program,” Tech said BBCK.

This time it feels different, he said.

“This thing distinguishes from previous efforts to cut society’s well-being programs, that the Republicans will be the will of the Republicans of Congress, which appears, records a lot of concerns,” he said. “Previously, they were always moderate Republicans, especially in the Senate, but suffered concessions in two homes.”

They are sent to two things: the fear of collecting the wrong side of Trump and the fear of public delay. For representatives who preserve the seats of Congress.

BBC contacted Riley Moore Congress, Martinsburg, West Virginia, the effects of cutting effects on its components, but did not respond.

Moore voted for the initial home invoice, the cuts were included.

Missouri Josh Hawley, has been one of the best criticism of cutting.

Two Jordan father, so that his surname is not used, has spent the last three years alive in Snap benefits.

He and his wife get about 700 dollars a month to feed four families, but they continue to fight.

The 26th young man says that his wife has been fighting at work and trying to take care of his two children at the same time, so if it makes changes to his family, it is ready to play and get the second job.

“I will ensure that I can do everything I can feed my family,” he said.

He and West West Virginians is following the invoice to the Congress.

Cameron Whezel, 25 years old, was subject to a family. But when he tried to make Snap request for him and his wife, he knew it was too much time to make it time for $ 15, he said.

“It’s not great that I need to double my salary to pay food,” Whezel said, “We don’t” don’t buy eggs that are too expensive in four months. “

It is frustrated that Washington officials do not understand the effects of cutting cuts that are protected by Congress, he said.

“Then, when he put a federal cut, it would already be placed in the struggling state, like throwing a horse,”, Whezel says. “If you believe in small government or in large governments, the government must give someone somehow.”

BERND DEBUSMANN JR with more news

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *