What does each side want a peace deal

The future of Ukraine is the focus of the Munich Security Conference (MSC), calling the President of the US President Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin Russian President and Vladimir Putin.

Describe the call earlier this week, like “great”, Trump said “good war was a good opportunity to end this horrible and bloody”.

The President of Ukraine warned Volodymyr Zelensky that his country should not be left out of peace talks.

The European ally showed himself with the nature of the call, a warning of France by Emmanuel Macron, “he would play wrong”.

It is still not clear that peace negotiations can start, rather than problems around the territory, security negotiations and the future of Ukraine will be among the most important discussion issues. That’s where different sides are.

Moscow controls around the fifth of the Ukraine territory, especially in the south and east.

After the President of the Ukrainian Pro-Russian, Russia added a black sea peninsula in Crimean and sponsored the pro-Russian separatists in bloody battle in Donets and Luhanske.

Then the conflict exploded almost three years after the invasion of Russia’s scale.

Moscow were frustrated by attempting Kyiv capital, but since Russian forces spread territorial control, mostly in the east.

Ukrainian forces, which protect weapons and equipment in the US and Europe, have been as difficult as possible, and sometimes have been able to restart the territory, as well as an attack on Western Russia.

Ukraine always stressed the peace deal with Russian troops in the previous edges of 2014, including Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk.

“We’ve never admitted that the busy territory is Russian,” said Zelensky at the press conference made by MSC.

Russia, on the other hand, has attached four regions of East and southern Ukraine and recognizes as part of Russia, although not in control of all the territories of these regions.

In a conversation With the tutorZelensky suggested that Ukraine’s Russian territory in Ukraine, Ukraine could vary in the land of the Kursk region of Russia as part of a peace agreement. However, Kremlin quickly rejected that.

Until recently, western allies of Ukraine It was next to Zelensky’s position Everything in Ukraine, including Crimea, should be returned.

But the U.S. defense Secretary Pete Hegseth threw cold water in these expectations, saying the previous limits of 2014 saying in February was the “real goal”.

“Walking this excitement of this excitement will stretch the wars and cause more suffering,” he said.

Ukraine wants to join I, arguing the western military alliance – in which members commit to go against each other if you are attacking – it is the best way to ensure its safety.

For Kyiv, Russia’s full-scale invasion can only guarantee the members of the NATO.

However, Russia has constantly opposed the idea of ​​being a member of Ukraine, fearing that Nato will approach his limits.

When he arrived for MSC, Zelensky said that Ukraine had a reliable security guarantee of NATO, before thinking that the affiliate would be the “cheapest opportunity for everyone.”

Europe must meet throughout Ukraine to protect himself, he added.

Natus members should become a member of Ukraine in the future, the UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said Zelensky said to be a member of Zelensky “irreversible path”.

But these guarantees are now stronger, after the U.S. defense Secretary decreased the possibility of becoming a member of the NATO, in peace settlement.

“The United States do not think that NATO is a realistic result of a settlement of Ukrainian settlements,” South said.

Zelensky said Donald Trump’s discussions with the President of the US “They certainly are not enough to make peace.”

He arrived at MSC, saying that the signs coming from the US were “strong” but they were “varied.”

The wing claimed that Trump was able to join both sides, which was an effort to negotiate peace, “he certainly invaded by Ukrainian soldiers”.

Meanwhile, the US vice prescribed to send troops to Ukrainian “that it is on the table” that Russia does not negotiate a peace agreement in good faith.

“The President is not entering this with Blinders,” said JD Vance Wall Street Journal told him.

In October, Zelensky He carried his victory plan to Ukraine parliamentPoints such as NATO members included NATO members, the protection of the US and the EU critic natural resources and Russia, through non-nuclear strategic deterrions deployed in Ukrainian soil.

At the time the US President, Joe Biden, was given a plan about this plan, then presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Donald Trump.

There is no part of Zelensky’s plans that will be taken to peace lectures, but Hesgeth warned that he would not be a soldier in Ukraine in the future in the future safety organization.

Zelensky told Guardian does not believe that security guarantees work without our involvement.

UK defense sources mentioned Times newspaper Claim the US could give the air defense form Probably patriotic missiles – To access minerals with peace for peace in Ukraine.