Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

RF JR can pull MRNA vaccine funding to make the miscalculation be awesome?


Getty Images Robert F Kennedy Jr. Next to the face of Jr. is screwed near the face Getty Images

Mrna vaccines were interconnected as a doctor who saved his life during Covid Pandemia, but the US is being investigated again.

US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy JR has canceled 22 projects – cost $ 500 million (£ 376 million) in financial – Covid and flu infections.

Is Kennedy probably the most famous vaccine in the country, is it a point, or is doing monumental miscalculation?

Prof Adam Finn, Bristol University Vaccine Researcher, is “both” but MRNA technology is “stupid” and potentially “catastrophic mistake”.

Let’s not understand why.

Kennedy has reviewed that Science reviews about Mrna vaccines, “These vaccines show that these vaccines are not effective against Covid and flu breathing infections.”

Instead, it says, funding is “safer and comprehensive, as effective viruses are muted.”

So are MRNA vaccines safe? Are they effective? Would other vaccine technology be better?

And another question is where MRNA vaccines must be inserted in the panthe of other vaccination technologies – because there are many:

  • Inactivated vaccines Use the original virus or bacteria, kill and use the immune system – such as the annual flu
  • Lighten the vaccines Do not kill an infectious agent, but it causes light infection to make it weaker, such as MMR (measles, Mumps and rubella) vaccination
  • Conjugate vaccines Use protein or sugar parts from an error so that it sparks immune response without infection – like types of meningitis
  • MRNA vaccines Use part of the genetic code to make parts of viruses to the body, and the immune system reacts to it

Each has advantages and disadvantages, but Finn argues “too much” outpyd “to exclude other approaches to MrNA vaccines during the pandemic, and now the process of adjusting.

“But MRN has no value and no value and does not require stupid values that should be worth and understand, he did notice things,” he noted.

Graphic, the MRNA vaccine shows how scientists who operate a part of the genetic code of the virus.

Do MRNA vaccines work?

Mrna vaccines not claimed that Covid and the upper flu infections are true “, says Oxford Pollard Profiles, vaccination and immunization (JCVI).

Vaccines protected – maintaining people alive and outside the hospital – both in clinical trials and then vaccines when they control how they were made to the whole world.

In the first year of the grafting on Covid Pandemic, it was estimated that the PFIZER / BIDETech MRNA vaccine was saved only almost 6 million lives.

Against, there was a small case of inflammation of heart tissue – called Myocarditis – especially in young men.

“The very rare side effects should be balanced against the great benefit of technology,” says Prof Pollarre.

Pandemia was a time when the world was focused on Covid and the vaccine census was strongly monitored. The opinions of the consensus have been very good than damage.

But that doesn’t mean that the perfect technology is perfect.

Getty Images Scientists have blue gloves, a lab coat and hair network containing a clean liquidGetty Images

The MRNA Covid vaccine focuses on the only protein to extract the immune system from the virus. If Coronavirus’s protein changes or muted, the protection of the body decreases.

We have seen the consequences of this – immune queues and vaccines must be updated.

A theoretical argument is that the vaccination approach is different, such as using a full virus – it would provide better protection to focus more immune systems.

However, Prof Poliard says MRNA vaccines performed better than those who have been inactivated by Covid.

He probably says, and the process of killing viruses “changes viral proteins, lower stimulation of the immune system” compared to MRNA vaccines “.

The need to update vaccines is not to fail MRNA technology. It can be solved by pivotating from one technology to another. Instead, it has fallen into the basic nature of some viruses.

Vaccines have been effective in thousands or HPVs (human papiloma virus) for decades and do not fail, since the genetic virus code are more stable in each case.

But some viruses live in a state of full flow.

The flu, for example, is not a virus, but a target that changes constantly. At any time, a voltage will be ascending and likely to create winter problems.

In the flu, the flu injection of adults is updated annually – it is a live vaccine that is given to children as a nasal spray. The future Mrne’s anti-flu would work in the same way.

“Maintenance of variants is about all the technologies, not only MRNA,” says Prof Pollarre.

MRNA speed is “streets” when needed

There is a legitimate scientific question and the technology of vaccination is used.

What creates concern among scientists is MRNA’s research means that we don’t have those vaccines sometimes when we don’t have to have other technologies.

Prof Pollard says, “I don’t think evidence of better protection, but RNA Tech has streets in front of everything, because it responds to outbreaks.”

The world is very dug each year to make new flu vaccines. However, then, it is a six-month process to focus on new flu strains, the vaccine grows on the scale of chicken eggs. New vaccines take even more.

With MRNA, however, you can have a new vaccine for six to eight weeks and then tens or hundreds of doses of doses later.

Some of the projects in the US had been preparing pandemia of bird flu. This virus, H5N1, destroyed bird populations and many other animals have included American cattle.

“This makes no sense and if we get a human flu pandemic for the bird can be seen as a catastrophic error,” says Finn.

But departing from the US MRNA research could be more and more US ramifications.

What impact does this move in today’s vaccines, Mrnan or otherwise trust? How does the US affect the US when one of the most important medical research countries? And will it affect MRNA technology, such as cancer vaccines – or use the approach to treat rare genetic diseases?

Prof Pollard is another question after RFK JR’s movement: “Does it endanger us if the awesome market returns on top of RNA?

“It is one of the most important technologies we will see in infectious diseases. In infectious diseases, critically biotherapeutic agents and cancer for rare diseases. It is a message.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *